← All projectsData Science/Analytics

Monelytics

PythonPandasscikit-learnNumPyMatplotlibSeabornStreamlitMachine LearningDeep LearningData VisualizationTeamworkCommunication

The problem

Comparing forecasting approaches requires a consistent data pipeline and evaluation rather than a single prediction.

How I solved it

I led exploratory analysis, preprocessing, feature engineering and LSTM implementation. The team compared classical ML, time-series and deep-learning approaches and connected the analysis to an interactive Streamlit interface.

  • AI-powered stock prediction for Indonesia's big four banks
  • Implemented multiple ML models (Linear Regression, SVR, Random Forest, ARIMA)
  • Integrated DL models (CNN, ANN, LSTM, Prophet)
  • Used RMSE and MAE for performance metrics
  • Led data exploration and feature engineering

The results

analysis coverage
4 banks
team modeling scope
9 approaches

Compared nine approaches for four Indonesian banks. The team delivered five modeling notebooks, four bank-specific LSTM files and a Streamlit application with RMSE/MAE comparisons.

Evaluation context. Team project. Scaler fitting before a shuffled split, date alignment and the LSTM UI model-file selection limit forecasting claims. Model artifacts exist; reliable future-price performance is not established.

πŸ€—